Mike bought the Springsteen memoir for me (thanks!!) and I am a hundred pages into it, and I have
to say that one of my main illusions about the man has been shoved aside for
good. See, I always had it in my mind that this guy was at least 40% literary,
that words came early in the process and that they were a central part of the origin
story for Bruce. Turns out that the guitar meant 100% to him, that he wasn't
even the singer (I knew that) and that he didn’t really yearn to be (I didn't think that one through until now). Moreover,
the bands up and down the shore were just about all instrumental bands when he
as coming up and it doesn’t seem to have occurred to a young him that words in
a song could have a primary place in the kind of music he loved.So different from the generations that followed. Thank you, Bob Dylan!!
I am hoping the focus of the book changes, that his attention to
literary detail becomes a bigger part of the story. Bruce is an interesting
guitarist, but I would not say that he is in any way some kind of guitar genius.
Songwriting, yes. Lyricist, absolutely. Guitarist? He has his moments, but
there is also a lot of incoherent soloing in his live repertoire. So that's the surprising thing about the book so far. But I'd have to
say that it is extremely well-written. Very funny in places! Reminds
me of the Sinatra biography that the King of Rock recommended a few years back.
What was the title of that book, Rock? The thing that struck me about that
Sinatra book was how closely identified every kid in his Hoboken neighborhood was with
their ethnic identity. The first thing you needed to know about a stranger in
Sinatra's neighborhood was ethnicity: Italian? Jewish? Irish? Something else?
That got you slotted into your world and your niche in it.
I still do remember growing up, though, and those
vestiges remained. I know (or think I do) the ethnic background of everyone on
the yak. Why should that be? Kind of like gender
these days for Millennials and Generation Z, the old categories have become so
fluid as to have almost vanished. I ask my students sometimes—almost always when
they have an obvious Italian or Irish name—if their family arrived here
recently and if they have family in zee olt country. Many of them seem shocked
to be asked and have no good answer. It is almost as if who we are begins these
days with our births. For Springsteen (and for us too), I think, who we are
started generations before we happened to be born. Here is how he describes meeting one of the many, many girlfriends who populate this memoir: “She was Italian, funny, a beatific tomboy, with just the
hint of a lazy eye, and wore a pair of glasses that made me think of the
wonders of the library.” That's a funny line! It's also instructive that the first adjective is so totally locked down on ethnicity. It seems inescapable for a kid of Springsteen's age who is trying to make sense of his world.
This idea obviously intersects with the King's posting of
two weeks ago. Springsteen grew up in a world where your ethnicity and heritage
determined a great deal about how you might live your life. For kids today, I
think, that's much less true. We are curing our society of its terrifying ills by, what,
erasing important information from our libraries? I used to be a white male of Irish
and Italian (like Bruce!) heritage. I really don’t know what I'd be if I were
born these days. I think the old categories are fading. How do we define
ourselves? Is it what we do? What we believe? Political party? Socioeconomic
status? And what will we all be fifty years hence?
Not sure where this idea is taking me. I guess I need to keep reading to see how Bruce searches for an finds his community. Once he moves to Rumson in 1983--the home of the preppy rah-rahs with whom he had clashed over the years--how will he define himself? This question continues to have real relevance to me, a person who abandoned home for the Midwest and who still has not found his feet under him.
Anyone else want to read this book along with me and Mike?
I'll have more to say about this post, but I bought Born to Run last week and though I'm only a few chapters in, I think it's great. There's a book in front of it (Jesus: An Historical Approximation, by Jose Antonio Pagola), but I can definitely read Bruce's bio with you guys; it seems like it will be a page-turner. Why am I reading Jesus: An Historical Approximation? Last Summer, I read How Jesus Became God: The Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from Galilee, by Bart D. Ehrman, an ex-(and probably unbelieving) Evangelical Christian. After reading it, I became interested in Christology, or the study of who Jesus is/ is thought to be. Luckily for me, I'm Facebook friends with Chris Franz, who gave me a list of books to read...
ReplyDeleteI just ordered Born to Run. Sounds like an interesting book. I, like you, Bill, thought that Springsteen started with the words, especially after re-listening to "Greetings from Asbury Park." I can't promise how quickly I'll get through it, though. I just got a new class mid-semester and it's slowing me down.
ReplyDeleteThe name of the Sinatra book was Why Sinatra Matters, by Pete Hamill (https://www.amazon.com/Why-Sinatra-Matters-Pete-Hamill/dp/0316347175/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1478042076&sr=8-1&keywords=why+sinatra+matters).
ReplyDelete